post

Build What You Have!

Since you’re reading this, we know you’re wanting to capture some data with InspectAll but you might not know where to start.  A lot of people come to us and ask – what kind of plan do I need before I get started using InspectAll.  Then, they spend weeks working on spreadsheets, new checklists, ROI spreadsheets, watching our webinars, and asking all kinds of questions trying to think of the perfect way to do everything.

Unfortunately, we see a lot of these endeavors fail.  Its not that they’re not noble ideas or shouldn’t be done, but we know that most of us are just too busy to spend hours building a whole new way of doing things!  After all, InspectAll is supposed to make things easier!

Just like we believe you have to get wet to learn to swim, the same goes for InspectAll.  There’s no better way to build your program than to start building it.  InspectAll is built for fast prototyping and quick results.  If the end product gets a little crooked don’t worry – you can always change it (and we’ll be here to help)!

Custom Form Builder

Custom Form Builder

So, let’s get started – Try putting what you have already into InspectAll.

Not only will this give you great practice building Forms, but you’ll start to learn the capabilities of the program – and it’ll help you think of new and interesting ways to use InspectAll that you won’t get by building everything in a spreadsheet first.  Remember:  InspectAll is more powerful than a Spreadsheet, but it’s easier to use because we build the database for you!

The other key advantage to starting with what you already have is that your old Forms and Checklists are tried, true, and tested.  Chances are that you and your coworkers have filled out these forms hundreds (if not thousands) of times in the past.  You’re going to need to get used to our terminology (Folders, Forms, and Assets) – so keeping the same format that you used in the past will help with the transition.

Ultimately, you’re usually already capturing everything that’s needed the old way anyways, and we can help you pick a report that dresses up that data in a way that you want!

post

OSHA Inspectors and InspectAll Users: A Brief Comparison

Would you believe me if I told you that the  average InspectAll user is 10x more productive than the average OSHA Inspector?

Well, you should – because OSHA recently published the key statistics related to the OSHA budget and compliance program.  Quite simply, the statistics show that the average OSHA Inspector is performing about 42.1 inspections per year.  Compare that to the companies that are using InspectAll, and you’ll see that the average inspector using InspectAll is generating around 400 inspections per year.  While it might not be exactly 10x as productive – the gap is extraordinary in our opinion.

Start adding that increase in productivity up, and InspectAll can help you do more with less – there’s no question.  For those already working with InspectAll, you know that the combination of your processes and our software can save about 12 minutes on every inspection performed – which ultimately leads to about 80 hours saved for every inspector over a year.  While we don’t suggest giving all of your inspectors two extra weeks of vacation after implementing InspectAll, we’re excited that it’s helping drive so much value into our customer’s organizations.

Among many other goals, we will continue to drive for increased efficiency for our mobile workers – helping them work safer, smarter, and more effectively.  At InspectAll, we’re committed to safety – and we’re excited to learn and grow with our customers.

For a little more info on OSHA’s recent statistics, here’s an excerpt and link to the common statistics on the OSHA website:

Federal OSHA coverage

Federal OSHA is a small agency; with our state partners we have approximately 2,200 inspectors responsible for the health and safety of 130 million workers, employed at more than 8 million worksites around the nation — which translates to about one compliance officer for every 59,000 workers.

Federal OSHA has 10 regional offices and 90 local area offices.

OSHA budget

FY 2011: $573,096,000
FY 2012: $583,386,000

OSHA inspections

FY 2011 Total Federal inspections: 40,648
FY 2011 Total 18(b) State Plan inspections: 52,056
[Source: OSHA Directorate of Enforcement Programs]

post

Paper versus electronic checklists, why corporate culture continues the paper route.

In 1987 Northwest Airlines Flight 255 was taking off for a flight from Detroit to Phoenix. The airliner lifted off the runway, but the plane rolled back and forth and was unable to gain enough lift for flight. Within seconds, the plane had struck a light pole severing it’s left wing tip and igniting engine fuel. It then crashed into a nearby highway, barreling into an overpass killing 154 passengers and crew. The only survivor was a 4 year old girl whose entire family was killed in the crash.

Upon investigation of the crash, the NTSB found that the plane’s wing flaps were never extended, reducing the plane’s chances of gaining lift off the ground to zero. But why were the flaps not extended? Surely, the 2 experienced pilots would not have forgotten such a crucial step in the take off procedure. Upon further investigation of the flight’s data recorder and voice recorder it was discovered that the pilots neglected to run a crucial taxi checklist before takeoff that included the extension of the flaps.

This crash as well as a nearly identical crash 1 year later of Delta Air Lines Flight 1141 would lead the NTSB to ask for a re-evaluation of the airline industries checklists. They enlisted the help of one of the most strenuous practitioners of checklist procedures, NASA.

NASA expert Asaf Degani investigated the current checklist procedures and took part in over 140 hours of flights to personally see how checklists were conducted. He then wrote a report on his findings and recommendations citing many inefficiencies in the way checklists were written and being conducted. In 1987 pilots were required to run a series of checklists during several scenarios. The most common checklists were written on paper cards that were then followed through vocally one by one by pilot and co-pilot. Degani found several disadvantages to the use of a paper checklist.

The main one is the lack of a pointer to distinguish between accomplished and non-accomplished items. Other disadvantages are the lack of a memory system to store unaccomplished items…Paper checklists can also be difficult to read at night in low levels of cockpit illumination.

B-32 Checklist

The B-32′s paper checklist did not give any feedback on tasks already performed.

At the time, Degani also evaluated the only airplane to have a computer checklist system installed, the Airbus A-320.

The advantages of a computer-aided checklist, regardless of whether or not it is integrated to the
feedback loop, are quite obvious. The device aids the pilot by providing a pointer, storing skipped
items, and eliminating the need to occupy one hand in holding the checklist card.

In the end, Degani offered several recommendations for the airline industries checklists including:

  • Subdividing long checklists into smaller task-checklists or chunks.
  • Having the most critical items on the checklist be listed as close as possible to the
    beginning of the checklist.
  • The use of hands and fingers to touch appropriate controls, switches, and displays while
    conducting the checklist.

So, why am I talking about an airline accident and investigation that happened 35 years ago when the recommendations for reducing further accidents were so clearly defined? There are still deficiencies within the airline industries checklist procedures made evident by Spanair Flight 5022 crash 21 years later in a Madrid airport. The reason for the crash was the pilot’s failure to conduct the taxi checklist and therefore not extend the wing’s flaps. Coincidentally, 154 people also died in this accident.

Many industries today still rely on paper checklists to follow procedures that could help in the prevention of loss of life and injury. Degani spoke to the culture of these industries as playing a large part in why paper checklists are still so heavily relied upon.

In most cases, the checklist philosophy-of-use is the outgrowth of the company’s corporate  “culture.” This term includes many factors that contribute to the overall operational concept of the organization, including management style, supervision concepts, delegation of responsibilities in the chain of command, punitive actions, etc.

With the advent of new technologies today like handheld and tablet devices, there are many reasons why companies today should work towards instituting electronic checklist systems and procedures. These electronic checklists will give proper feedback to users on tasks performed, allow for returning to skipped questions, and give instant over site to management and superiors on checklists performed.

Learn about InspectAll’s electronic forms and checklists application for iPhone and iPad.

post

Hand Protection – The Right Way

Hand protection is a critical, but often overlooked, component of workplace safety.

After all, a study from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) estimates that there were over 320,000 hand and finger injuries in the US alone for one year (1).  The same study identified that 70% of hand injuries resulted from workers not wearing gloves, and the other 30% resulted from workers wearing gloves that were either inadequate, damaged or the wrong type.  In 2006, hand injuries accounted for more than 27% of injuries and illnesses in the workplace.

With all of that in mind, how do we eliminate these two problems?

Step 1 – Buy the Correct Hand ProtectionReduce 30% of injuries.

Buying hand protection is easy – buying the correct hand protection can be challenging.  After all, if you log on to grainger.com to look at their hand protection options – they have over 5,500 gloves in 23 categories that you can choose from.    After that, you have to figure out the right size glove for the application – which isn’t always as easy as it sounds.  With all the variables, it’s very challenging to find the correct glove.

Thankfully – you don’t have to do this alone.  There are a lot of great safety supply companies that will analyze your tasks, observe the conditions present, look at the duration of use, and examine the hazards that dictate hand protection (all the stuff that OSHA says that you need to do).  They’ll even document the result and give it to you.  The best part is, a lot of them do it for FREE with InspectAll with the hope that you’ll buy your gloves from them.  A few great companies that we know of that do this are Fastenal Company and US Safety Depot.

Step 2 – Use Hand ProtectionReduce 70% of injuries.

Just like Step 1, a good safety supply company will also help you put a program together to encourage employees to use proper hand protection.  Through workplace assessments, proper glove selection, adequate and timely supply, and effective training – you’ll get the opportunity to put a program together that your employees will value and participate in.

Further, you’ll have a step-by-step process and partner that will help you re-evaluate your process and make sure that you’re up to date with your hand protection requirements.  In the event that you have a problem, these partners are there to help you through it.

So, with all the complexity surrounding hand protection, the crux of our suggestion is – don’t go it alone.  There are great companies out there with specialists that are willing to help you for free.  We know a lot of those companies – and a lot of them use InspectAll.  If you’d like to know more – let us know your thoughts.

WHAT’S OSHA SAY?
For industrial companies, OSHA defines the regulations for Personal Protective Equipment – Hand Protection in OSHA 1910.138(a)-(b) and states that “employers shall select and require employees to use appropriate hand protection.”  OSHA goes further to say that the “employers shall base the selection of the appropriate hand protection on an evaluation of the performance characteristics of hand protection relative to the task(s) to be performed.” (2)  OSHA then states that the following criteria should be considered:

  • Task(s) to be performed
  • Conditions present
  • Duration of use
  • Hazards – existing and potential

CITATIONS:
(1)  OSHA/BLS Statistics
(2)  OSHA Standard

DISCLAIMER:
InspectAll Software, LLC disclaims all warranties, both express and implied, relating to the information, reports, opinions and analysis disclosed in this blog. InspectAll shall not be liable  for any errors or omissions, or any losses, injuries or damages arising from the use of such information, reports, opinions and analysis.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 73 other followers